Microsoft's Live Hotmail-Outlook Connector beta ready for download

Apple plugs three Safari for Windows holes

iPhone disappoints mobile developers

(InfoWorld) - No one ever said Apple marketers weren't clever. So if they wanted to start a firestorm of ISVs developing applications for the iPhone, how better to do that than to make development as simple as possible with the least barriers?
Nevertheless, until we hear more details from Apple about the way in which applications are handled on the iPhone, we won't know how clever Apple really is.
At WWDC07, Jobs promised that there will be a "new way to create applications for the iPhone" due mainly to the fact that it uses the full Safari browser engine.
But a lot of developers are disappointed with what Apple is offering.
"Web-based apps are cool for a lot of things. But what people were looking forward to was to to let them develop native applications," said Anthony Meadow , president of Bear River Associates , an ISV for mobile applications
Without native access to facilities, you don't have storage or sharing of information between applications, or reading and writing from address book and iCal. "There is not any easy way to do that with a Web-based application," said Meadow.
Overall, Meadow was not impressed. Although he admitted it is really not very clear what Apple intends. But, he added, "If they don't intend to have access, they should just tell us."
Ken Dulaney, the senior mobile analyst with Gartner says Apple's Web 2.0 solution is likely to be similar to what RIM does now.
"It avoids having to put code down on the device," Says Dulaney, which in turn protects it from crashing due to outside influences.
On RIM devices, the application is rendered on the server side, and the cache in the browser reformats it and pushes it down to the device.
"The code is only resident briefly on the device," Dulaney said.
Similar technology is also used by device manufacturers using mobile Linux from MontaVista.
Now resident on tens of millions of cell phones, the MontaVista design uses a "computing peer" design, Linux on the server and on the phone, giving developers the flexibility of partitioning an application on the client side and server side. An ISV can put a heavy load on the phone or a light one, says Jim Ready, CTO and founder of MontaVista.
"Linux on the phone is every bit as capable as Linux on the server," said Ready.
Certainly this supports similar statements from Jobs about Safari on the desktop and Safari on the iPhone.
However, like Meadow at Bear River, Ready has some reservations about the future capabilities or the richness of applications running on the iPhone.
When applications are developed solely using an "abstracted" development environment that doesn't talk to the lower layers of the device, such as the hardware and middleware, there is a dividing line in terms of the capabilities of the application.
"Take video frame rates. The reason you back out of an abstracted environment is because you pay for the abstraction in performance. It is a tradeoff," said Ready.
And not only for performance -- developers also need to write native applications that get down closer to access the hardware and the middleware for size and control reasons, as well, although Meadow doesn't see access to hardware as a major problem. "There is a handful of people that care about writing to the chips. It is possibly useful for really high performance graphic drivers and low level networking code," he says.
So where does that leave gamers and business users whose need for rich network applications might be problematic on the iPhone?
Unfortunately, until the full story is known, it is hard to tell what the software limitations of the iPhone will be. Certainly, if Apple wants the device to be a great mobile gaming system for use by millions of road warriors during those long waits at the airport, it will have to address the issue of how to get developers to write applications native to both the hardware and middleware.
In business as well, cell phones are currently being used with customized software, such as bar code and RFID readers.
"You can't do that with a browser interface," says Jerry Panagrossi, vice present of U.S. Operations for Symbian. "You need something more in-depth that can talk to IBM or Oracle middleware using native APIs for a richer experience."
Jim Ready at MontaVista sums it up when he says keeping the development environment as simple as possible will facilitate the largest amount of applications. As far as the capabilities of those applications Ready says, "There are limits, but sometimes it's okay that there are limits."
ADVERTISEMENT
IBM Information On Demand 2006
Industrial Industry Leaders, please join us at IBM's premier information management global event, IBM Information On Demand 2006, October 15-20, Anaheim, CA. More IBM business and technical solutions content in one place than ever before! Select from over 800 sessions. Register today!
Blogger Adds Video Uploading

The first feature added to Blogger's labs is video uploading: you're now able to upload videos directly from Blogger's editor. After you click on the video icon, you only need to select a video from your computer and to enter a title.

The video will be uploaded to Google, but until it's ready you'll see this nice placeholder:

You can continue to edit the post during the upload, but you can't publish it until the upload finishes. The video can be aligned and resized in the rich-text mode and that's a good idea since the initial size is very small.
Google hides the details of the implementation and includes this obscure code in your post that depends on some JavaScript to actually work:
<object id="BLOG_video-b1ce175e95d1aa16" class="BLOG_video_class" contentid="b1ce175e95d1aa16" height="255" width="291"></object>The videos don't seem to be uploaded to Picasa Web Albums and they're not available at Google Video either, so it's unclear how you can reuse them or share them. Blogger mentions that "your videos are kept private and will not be included in Google Video search."
PayPal API Goes Mobile

Linspire, Microsoft in Linux-related deal

The GridView Row Drag Overlay Extender

I finally got a chance to play with the Ajax futures release over the weekend. The controls look very impressive!
Just for fun, I wrote a simple drag overlay extender that allows you to drag and drop rows in/across GridViews. 
Anytime a Gridview row is dragged and dropped onto another row or header, a post back occurs raising a RowDrop event with details about the rowIndex and GridView where the drag started and where it was dropped onto.
Initially, the drag in IE 6/7 was sluggish. It looks like when you register a drop target using the Sys.Preview.UI.DragDropManager.registerDropTarget method, a reference to the DOM element is stored in an internal array. When a drag is in progress, IE continuously loops through the array of registered dropped targets looking for a potential drop target. This is done by calculating the bounds of each element in the array with the help of the Sys.UI.DomElement.getBounds method. This seemed to make IE sluggish.
The workaround I have in the sample code, which should work in most simple scenarios, is to store the bounds of each element as an expando property of the element so that on subsequent loops, it is fetched from the property rather than being calculated again. The sample contains the original implementation and the one with the tweak. The tweak is stored in a js file in the Scripts folder.
Note that the Ajax Control Toolkit already contains a cool ReorderList control.
You can download my sample here (don't forget to build it first :)
Primary
Mirror
Note again that it uses the Ajax Futures Relese (May 2007).
eBay Stares Down Google And Wins

AT&T Decides To Start Throwing Money Away By Attempting To Filter Copyrighted Content

Furthermore, it's worth wondering, what's the business case here? Did AT&T's new friends in Hollywood threaten it with a lawsuit, or promise it a better price on content? There must be some reason that the company would decide to go to the trouble and expense of implementing some fingerprinting and filtering system, then throwing more money at it in a futile attempt to make it work, pissing off their paying customers all the while. Whatever the motivation, the company's opening up a giant can of worms with significant legal and privacy implications. Perhaps if nothing else, this illustrates the point that pro-net neutrality groups don't need to make things up about AT&T and its executives; they do plenty of egregious things on their own. It also underlines that the issue of net neutrality is one of competition. If there was real competition in the broadband market, AT&T could never get away with a move like this, as it's basically a reason for customers to change providers. But given the lack of a truly competitive market, it can, and it will.