With the announcement that Microsoft will not ease up on its EULA (End User License Agreement) terms for virtualizing lower-tiered versions of Windows Vista, Microsoft has once again pulled out the security argument for its decision again and I must say that I find it rather insulting. It's not that I think Microsoft doesn't have a right as a private business to set the terms of the EULA as they see fit, but don't take us for fools. If they want to restrict Virtualization, just come out and say it and don't make up ridiculous excuses for it. If Microsoft doesn't want Mac users to be able to run Vista Home inside Parallels for strategic reasons, then that is their...